1986
DOI: 10.1159/000206008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Value of Immunological Leukemia Phenotyping

Abstract: The diagnostic value of immunological leukemia phenotyping using a panel of reagents in immunofluorescence assays was assessed in 309 consecutive patients. The cells from 307 patients could be clearly phenotyped and assigned to one of the subgroups with a definite immunophenotype. Each phenotype was characterized by a distinct marker profile. A simplified classification scheme based on surface antigen expression is presented. A combination of complementary reagents (‘first panel’) was used for the first-line s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AML thus differs from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in which the primacy of morphology is complemented by blast cell immunophenotyping; four main subtypes, of similar morphological appearances, have thus been identified (Chessels et al, 1977). More recently monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) defining granulocytic, monocytic, erythroid, and megakaryocytic lineages have been increasingly used to support the diagnosis of AML (Drexler et al, 1986a;Neame et al, 1986;Foon et al, 1986;Messner and Griffin, 1986;Wain and Borowitz, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AML thus differs from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in which the primacy of morphology is complemented by blast cell immunophenotyping; four main subtypes, of similar morphological appearances, have thus been identified (Chessels et al, 1977). More recently monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) defining granulocytic, monocytic, erythroid, and megakaryocytic lineages have been increasingly used to support the diagnosis of AML (Drexler et al, 1986a;Neame et al, 1986;Foon et al, 1986;Messner and Griffin, 1986;Wain and Borowitz, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%