2015
DOI: 10.7754/clin.lab.2015.150507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Value of Fecal MicroRNAs for Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterogeneity. Heterogeneity underlying eligible studies was mirrored by the examination of threshold and nonthreshold effects among studies (25,27). As shown in Table II, Spearman's correlation coefficient of the overall effect size revealed a P>0.05, suggesting that no significant heterogeneity generated from the threshold effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heterogeneity. Heterogeneity underlying eligible studies was mirrored by the examination of threshold and nonthreshold effects among studies (25,27). As shown in Table II, Spearman's correlation coefficient of the overall effect size revealed a P>0.05, suggesting that no significant heterogeneity generated from the threshold effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Heterogeneity can be interpreted by both threshold and non-threshold effects (25,27). The threshold effect can be caused by different cut-off value settings as well as objective methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, fecal content has emerged as new and interesting source of miRNA biomarkers for IBD and colorectal cancer 12. For example, fecal miRNAs were proposed as potential biomarkers for colorectal cancer 13, 30, and a recent study showed that miRNAs in feces correlate with disease activity in IBD patients, and thus warrant further study as potential biomarkers for this disease 31. A limitation of our analysis is that, due to material limitations, microbiota and miRNA profiles were not analyzed at the same time point in our recipient mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Evaluating the downstream molecular symptoms derived from precancerous variants could improve sensitivity for adenomas. [15][16][17] However, analysis of human RNA biomarkers in stool samples is extremely challenging due to extensive RNA degradation and a high bacterial transcript burden. 18,19 Previous studies report that 25%-50% of stool samples evaluated for eukaryotic RNA are inadequate for downstream analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%