2018
DOI: 10.5603/nmr.2018.0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of F-18 FDG PET/CT for local and distant disease relapse surveillance in surgically treated RCC patients: Can it aid in establishing consensus follow up strategy?

Abstract: FDG PET-CT appears to be a very efficient tool in post-surgical surveillance of patients with RCC with notable ability to probe even uncommon sites of distant recurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18) For high-risk patients, the European Association for Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend the first CT six months after surgery and, subsequently, once a year up to three years and every two years afterwards. A recent report by Elahmadawy et al, 19) about detection of local and distant disease relapse in surgically treated patients with RCC, indicated that local and/or distant disease relapse was confirmed in 72% of patients. Regarding local recurrence, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographycomputed tomography (FDG PET-CT) showed specificity of 100%, compared to 98.6% with contrast-enhanced CT (P>0.05) and higher sensitivity noted with contrast-enhanced CT (100%) compared to 96% with FDG PET-CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18) For high-risk patients, the European Association for Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend the first CT six months after surgery and, subsequently, once a year up to three years and every two years afterwards. A recent report by Elahmadawy et al, 19) about detection of local and distant disease relapse in surgically treated patients with RCC, indicated that local and/or distant disease relapse was confirmed in 72% of patients. Regarding local recurrence, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographycomputed tomography (FDG PET-CT) showed specificity of 100%, compared to 98.6% with contrast-enhanced CT (P>0.05) and higher sensitivity noted with contrast-enhanced CT (100%) compared to 96% with FDG PET-CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, PET/CT has been implicated as a potentially helpful instrument in monitoring the therapeutic response to ICIs in mRCC. It was also emphasized that PET/CT determines and evaluates skeletal metastases more sensitively and accurately than conventional methods [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity and specificity ranging from 63% to 75% and from 90% to 100%, respectively, have been reported in detecting extra renal metastases when FDG PET was compared with conventional imaging techniques such as the CECT scan. [ 32 33 ] One of the most important factors affecting the sensitivity of PET/CT is the size of the lesion, with smaller lesions being more difficult to pick up as compared to the larger ones. Sensitivity increases from 73% to 90% when the lesion size increases from 1 to 2 cm and in patients with a true positive FDG PET, the mean size of the distant metastases was 2.2 cm (95% confidence interval, 1.7–2.6 cm) compared with 1.0 cm in the patients with false negative FDG PET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%