2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes in different regions of the body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This agreed with Vandecaveye et al [13] who correlated histopathologic and radiologic findings for lymph nodes (ADC value was 1.19 ± 0.22 for benign LNs and 0.85 ± 0.27 for malignant LNs; P < 0.001). Also, Seber and his colleagues [14] illustrated that mean ADC value for benign LNs was 0.97 and for malignant LNs was 0.76 (P < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agreed with Vandecaveye et al [13] who correlated histopathologic and radiologic findings for lymph nodes (ADC value was 1.19 ± 0.22 for benign LNs and 0.85 ± 0.27 for malignant LNs; P < 0.001). Also, Seber and his colleagues [14] illustrated that mean ADC value for benign LNs was 0.97 and for malignant LNs was 0.76 (P < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Also, Tondo et al [21] used ADC value of 1.25 as threshold to differentiate malignant from benign lesions with a 91% diagnostic accuracy, 90% sensitivity, 100% PPV and 57% NPV. Seber and colleagues [14] showed that in ROC analysis, the cutoff ADC value for malignant versus benign LNs differentiation was 0.8. Using an ADC value of 0.8, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant LNs were 76.4%, 85.7%, 86.6%, 75%, and 80.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balliu et al reported excellent agreement (k = 0.895) for WB-MRI in metastases detection [25]. On the other hand, earlier studies reported that the inter-observer agreement of WB-DWIBS is good (k = 0.66, 0.68) [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies discuss the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements for the identification of nodal metastases. These studies reported that malignant lymph nodes reported restricted diffusion with lower ADC values the than benign nodes [28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 In our study, the mean ADC value of the whole positive LNs was significantly lower than that of the whole negative LNs, which was consistent with the prior research results. 11 , 33 36 The means of short/long diameters in the whole positive LNs was also significantly longer than those in the whole negative LNs, respectively. These findings are also consistent with previous investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%