2019
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging, MR Perfusion, and MR Spectroscopy in Addition to Conventional MR Imaging in Intracranial Space-occupying Lesions

Abstract: Purpose: Our aim was to determine the diagnostic performance of the combined usage of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and perfusion MR (MRP) imaging for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant intracranial lesions. Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients with intracranial lesions who were prospectively evaluated with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), DWI, MRS, and MRP were included in this study. The lesions were classified as benign an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the diagnostic accuracy of MRS in our study was very high (100%), while Aydın et al . [ 19 ] reported an accuracy of 77% of MRS, and they reported diagnostic accuracy of 100% when MRS combined with diffuse weighted imaging (DWI) or perfusion MR (MRP). The strength of this study that MRS performed diagnostic accuracy of 100% without a combination of DWI or MRP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the diagnostic accuracy of MRS in our study was very high (100%), while Aydın et al . [ 19 ] reported an accuracy of 77% of MRS, and they reported diagnostic accuracy of 100% when MRS combined with diffuse weighted imaging (DWI) or perfusion MR (MRP). The strength of this study that MRS performed diagnostic accuracy of 100% without a combination of DWI or MRP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was agreed by all the members of our multidisciplinary neuro-oncology team and discussed with our ethics board. The scientific literature shows that biosignatures and 3-Tesla MRI with spectroscopic analysis of multiple regions of interest can be highly reliable [3][4][5], but no randomized studies have ever compared their safety and effectiveness versus standardof-care surgical biopsy, and no proof of validity for this approach exists. This said, our approach is in keeping with the preliminary experience and suggestions made by colleagues in the United States and Canada [6][7][8].…”
Section: Our Ethos and Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%