2022
DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of different urine tests for urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: There are differences in specificity and sensitivity of different routine urine tests for urinary tract infection, so meta-analysis was used to compare the diagnostic value of various urine analysis and detection methods in urinary tract infection, including bacterial culture, urine sediment microscopy, automated urinalysis, and routine urine dry chemical methods. Methods:The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SpringerLink, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to December 2021. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our opinion, this is unlikely: many symptoms are not specific to UTI, and there appears to be a ceiling on diagnostic performance using this approach. Of future interest would be to assess the gain in performance in using point-of-care tests for diagnostic purposes, which is the subject of one systematic review 29 and an ongoing subsequent review. 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion, this is unlikely: many symptoms are not specific to UTI, and there appears to be a ceiling on diagnostic performance using this approach. Of future interest would be to assess the gain in performance in using point-of-care tests for diagnostic purposes, which is the subject of one systematic review 29 and an ongoing subsequent review. 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was performed on 180 urine samples from anonymous patients, kindly provided by a regional general hospital, from 9 June to 15 September 2022. All the samples were first analyzed in the hospital microbiological laboratory by flow cytometry technique using the commercial urine particle analyzer UF-1000i instrument [ 3 ], reporting the concentrations of bacteria (BACT), white blood cells (WBL), fungi (F), epithelial and squamous cells (ESC) [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the CPT has the disadvantages that it usually requires more than 24 h and it is costly. Faster and more cost-effective approaches, based on dipstick analysis, are not satisfactory in terms of specificity and sensitivity [ 2 , 3 ]. Urine flow cytometry (UFC) is an attractive alternative for diagnosis of UTIs, leading to a reduction in cultures and antibiotics [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of false-negative and sterile cultures in UTIs is a critical consideration for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Urine cultures, while standard for UTI diagnosis, are known to have a high frequency of both false-positive and false-negative results [ 13 ]. The diagnostic threshold itself is often debated, with true UTIs sometimes associated with uropathogen growth of less than 100,000 CFU/mL, challenging the conventional threshold of ≥100,000 CFU/mL traditionally used to indicate an infection [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%