2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of combining tumor and inflammatory biomarkers in detecting common cancers in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of correlation between each individual biomarker in serum and blood cells in our study population supports the idea that whole blood and serum can be considered independent measurement sources. Furthermore, the negative result of combining biomarkers to improve their predictive value supports the recent idea of configuring panels consisting of uncorrelated biomarkers to reveal maximum information about patients [ 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The lack of correlation between each individual biomarker in serum and blood cells in our study population supports the idea that whole blood and serum can be considered independent measurement sources. Furthermore, the negative result of combining biomarkers to improve their predictive value supports the recent idea of configuring panels consisting of uncorrelated biomarkers to reveal maximum information about patients [ 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In as many as 1261 proteins, 9 protein biomarkers have been approved as “tumor-associated antigens” by the USFDA. Although these protein biomarkers have not yet been approved for MCED, in many Asian regions, such as China [ 35 ], Taiwan [ 33 ], the Republic of Korea [ 49 ], etc., the use of protein biomarkers for MCED has been put into practice for more than 10 years. The popularity of this approach lies in its convenience, as cancer screening for many different cancer types can be conducted with a simple blood test.…”
Section: Serum Biomarkers As Critical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, biomarkers in presymptomatic or asymptomatic cancer cases would be closer to those of healthy controls than in the symptomatic cancer cases. On healthy cases: The number of healthy control cases in a case-control study is usually up to several hundred given the fact that the ratio of cancer versus control ratio is set around 1:1–1:4 [ 15 , 17 , 34 , 49 ]. The relatively small number cannot represent the large diversity in the healthy control cases.…”
Section: Training and Validation Of Ai Models For Mcedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations