BackgroundMitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
It is unknown whether the criteria for MR classification are inadequate for
patients with DCM. ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the agreement among the four most common echocardiographic
methods for MR classification. MethodsNinety patients with DCM were included. Functional MR was classified using four
echocardiographic methods: color flow jet area (JA), vena contracta (VC),
effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO) and regurgitant volume (RV). MR was
classified as mild, moderate or important according to the American Society of
Echocardiography criteria and by dividing the values into terciles. The Kappa test
was used to evaluate whether the methods agreed, and the Pearson correlation
coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the absolute values of
each method. ResultsMR classification according to each method was as follows: JA: 26 mild, 44
moderate, 20 important; VC: 12 mild, 72 moderate, 6 important; ERO: 70 mild, 15
moderate, 5 important; RV: 70 mild, 16 moderate, 4 important. The agreement was
poor among methods (kappa = 0.11; p < 0.001). It was observed a strong
correlation between the absolute values of each method, ranging from 0.70 to 0.95
(p < 0.01) and the agreement was higher when values were divided into terciles
(kappa = 0.44; p < 0.01) ConclusionThe use of conventional echocardiographic criteria for MR classification seems
inadequate in patients with DCM. It is necessary to establish new cutoff values
for MR classification in these patients.