2014
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Value of Clinical, Laboratory, and Imaging Findings in Patients with a Clinical Suspicion of Gout: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: Individual clinical features show low diagnostic utility, with the exception of tophi and response to colchicine. Some US and DECT findings show better performance than most clinical features.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the strengths of the current study was confirmation of the presence of MSU crystals by compensated polarized microscopy. Despite the observation that some ultrasound‐defined signs (i.e., the double contour sign) have good diagnostic performance in gout , to date none of them is a substitute for SF analysis as the gold standard for diagnosing crystal‐related arthritis . In fact, in the present study the specific signs observed on ultrasound scans (double contour sign, tophi) alone showed no association with coronary outcomes, thus precluding the classification of patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia using ultrasonography without microscopy verification.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…One of the strengths of the current study was confirmation of the presence of MSU crystals by compensated polarized microscopy. Despite the observation that some ultrasound‐defined signs (i.e., the double contour sign) have good diagnostic performance in gout , to date none of them is a substitute for SF analysis as the gold standard for diagnosing crystal‐related arthritis . In fact, in the present study the specific signs observed on ultrasound scans (double contour sign, tophi) alone showed no association with coronary outcomes, thus precluding the classification of patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia using ultrasonography without microscopy verification.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In the previous EULAR recommendations,13 the first two recommendations stated that in the absence of SF analysis, a clinical diagnosis of gout can be reasonably made for typical presentations, particularly when patients present with podagra, that is, a gout flare at the first MTP joint. Since then, the predictive values (individually and combined) of typical clinical features of gout have been determined22–25 and new classification criteria and algorithms based solely on clinical signs and symptoms have been produced, in patients experiencing26 27 or not experiencing acute arthritis 28–30. Their external validity when compared with SF analysis has also been determined.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This need, in combination with the development of new therapeutic options, has focused attention on new imaging modalities and their potential to improve diagnosis and disease management, possibly rendering joint puncture unnecessary. A recent systematic literature review, as part of the 3e Initiative on Diagnosis and Management of Gout, highlighted dual energy computerized tomography (DECT) and ultrasound (US) as promising imaging tools that have shown markedly better performance than clinical findings, although further testing is warranted 6 . In comparison to DECT, US appears to be more feasible because it is patient-friendly, safe and non-invasive, free of ionizing radiation, allows multiple target assessment in real time, and may aid the aspiration process for relevant material for microscopy 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%