2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of a heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) bedside test in suspected acute coronary syndrome in primary care

Abstract: The H-FABP rapid test provides modest additional diagnostic certainty in primary care. It cannot be used to safely exclude rule out ACS. The test can only be used safely in patients otherwise NOT referred to hospital by the GP, as an extra precaution not to miss ACS ('rule in').

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of ACS was 10.6%, comparable with previous findings in the literature, where incidences of 1.5% to 22% were described. [28][29][30][31][32][33] The study team focused on deriving factors to be included in an algorithm of signs and symptoms combined with POC H-FABP testing predictive of ACS (stage 2 of the aforementioned stages of Stiell and Wells). 19 All criteria for a methodologically correct stage 2 (definition of outcomes and predictor variables, generalisability of subject selection, several statistical and methodological demands) are present in this study, except the inter-observer reliability for the clinical findings, which is difficult to measure in an acute setting.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence of ACS was 10.6%, comparable with previous findings in the literature, where incidences of 1.5% to 22% were described. [28][29][30][31][32][33] The study team focused on deriving factors to be included in an algorithm of signs and symptoms combined with POC H-FABP testing predictive of ACS (stage 2 of the aforementioned stages of Stiell and Wells). 19 All criteria for a methodologically correct stage 2 (definition of outcomes and predictor variables, generalisability of subject selection, several statistical and methodological demands) are present in this study, except the inter-observer reliability for the clinical findings, which is difficult to measure in an acute setting.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier study, based on a POC H-FABP test with a cut-off value of 7 ng/ml, performance of the test in clinical situations was insufficient. 28 The present study worked with a promising new POC H-FABP test with a cut-off value of 4 ng/ml, based on a clinical study with patients with chest pain in a secondary care emergency setting. 18 However, performance of this POC H-FABP test as a stand-alone test was insufficient.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding laboratory testing, different types of assays are frequently used in research and clinical settings for the detection and quantification of H-FABP in serum, plasma, or whole blood. These assays comprise enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [6,15,[35][36][37], immunoturbidimetric assays [38,39], multiplex assays [40,41], and immunochromatographic assays [42,43]. Test times depend on the type of assay, and vary between 5 and 120 minutes (as reviewed in [44]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low threshold for referring patients with chest complaints to secondary care is an effective strategy for the GP to avert missed cases of ACS [ 19 ]. In the Netherlands, this strategy results in 78% of referred patients that are ACS negative in the emergency room (positive predictive value (PPV) is 22%), whereas ACS is present in 5% of patients that are not referred (negative predictive value (NPV) is 95%) and the outcome is probably not severely affected by initially not referring (specificity and sensitivity of clinical assessment by GP: 55%, resp 81%) [ 6 , 20 ]. To enhance triage by a GP and reduce patient burden in secondary care, new diagnostic tools should become available [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier study in primary care evaluating a PoC-test on H-FABP did not lead to implementation of PoC-testing in daily practice because of a lack of NPV [ 20 ]. However, the PoC device for H-FABP used in this study used a cut-off value of 7 ng/ml, which is above the 99 th percentile of 5.7 ng/ml as found in a normal reference population [ 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%