2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, CCA is invasive and cannot be recommended as the sole diagnostic test, especially in patients with low-to-intermediate probability for CAD. For these patients, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a highly accurate diagnostic alternative, with regards to its correlation with CCA and its high negative predictive value to exclude C50 % stenosis [2,3]. Meanwhile, to determine the likelihood for lesions' functional significance, the use of a discrete threshold lacks sensitivity, specificity or both [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, CCA is invasive and cannot be recommended as the sole diagnostic test, especially in patients with low-to-intermediate probability for CAD. For these patients, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a highly accurate diagnostic alternative, with regards to its correlation with CCA and its high negative predictive value to exclude C50 % stenosis [2,3]. Meanwhile, to determine the likelihood for lesions' functional significance, the use of a discrete threshold lacks sensitivity, specificity or both [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, diagnostic sensitivity of coronary CT angiography has been significantly improved with 64-or more slice CT scanners when compared to the early generations of 4-and 16-slice scanners, while, the negative predictive value remains consistently high (>90%), regardless of the type of CT scanners [7][8][9][10][11]. This indicates the main role of coronary CT angiography is to rule out significant CAD, thus reducing the need for invasive coronary angiography.…”
Section: Disease; Diagnostic Value; Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Ancak bu tekniğin, işleme bağlı morbitide (%1,5) ve mortalite (%0,2) riski içermesinin yanın-da, invazif ve pahalı olması ve de kısa süre de olsa hastanede yatış gerektirmesi önemli dezavantajlarıdır [19]. Ayrıca, invazif KKA incelemesi bazen sadece KAH'ın varlığı ve yaygınlığının tespiti için yapılmaktadır.…”
Section: Koroner Arter Hastalığında Tanı Yöntemleriunclassified
“…Altmış dört kesitli koroner BT anjiyografi ile imaj kalitesi daha iyi hale gelmiş olup, KAH'ın tespitinde ve darlıkların ortaya konmasında sensitivitesi %83-98, spesifitesi ise %96-98 arasında değişmektedir [41,42]. Altmış dört kesit BT ile yapılan çoğu çalışmada sensitivite %90'dan fazla, spesifite %96'nın üzerinde ve negatif prediktif değeri ise %100 olarak rapor edilmiştir [19,43,44].…”
Section: Koroner Arter Hastalığının Tespitinde Bt Teknolojisinin Geliunclassified