2016
DOI: 10.1177/0734282916636500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Utility of the Social Skills Improvement System Performance Screening Guide

Abstract: Researchers investigated the diagnostic utility of the Social Skills Improvement System: Performance Screening Guide (SSIS-PSG). Correlational, regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and conditional probability analyses were run to compare ratings on the SSIS-PSG subscales of Prosocial Behavior, Reading Skills, and Math Skills, to report card grades for conduct, reading, and math, respectively. Respective subscales were all statistically significantly correlated with one another. In addition, all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, divergent validity was less substantiated based on these analyses (i.e., some of the items were also significantly correlated with less similar variables, such as Motivation to Learn being most strongly correlated with broadband internalizing/externalizing problems). Of course, prospective studies (e.g., Kettler et al, 2012; Kilgus et al, 2012; Krach et al, 2017) are needed to evaluate the ability of PSG items to facilitate accurate decision-making and to identify students in need of further services. For now, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that based on current research, scores on the four PSG items are significantly related to important academic and behavioral variables among students in elementary school settings, and therefore hold potential for contributing to universal screening approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, divergent validity was less substantiated based on these analyses (i.e., some of the items were also significantly correlated with less similar variables, such as Motivation to Learn being most strongly correlated with broadband internalizing/externalizing problems). Of course, prospective studies (e.g., Kettler et al, 2012; Kilgus et al, 2012; Krach et al, 2017) are needed to evaluate the ability of PSG items to facilitate accurate decision-making and to identify students in need of further services. For now, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that based on current research, scores on the four PSG items are significantly related to important academic and behavioral variables among students in elementary school settings, and therefore hold potential for contributing to universal screening approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-rater reliability, based on a comparison of an elementary student’s teacher and another person familiar with the student, yielded results in the moderate score reliability range (.55–.68). However, less information is available in the test manual regarding the validity of PSG scores; this lack of documented support has been identified as a significant weakness (Jenkins et al, 2014; Krach et al, 2017). The manual does not describe how items were developed and does not provide evidence of content validity specific to the PSG.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few research have been conducted applying ROC despite the advantage of giving quality information regarding the classification. It is not as widely used to evaluate students' knowledge and skills [13] though the ROC has been widely used in various disciplines including medical or clinical settings for diagnostic purposes [14][15][16][17]. As such, the goal of this paper is to introduce the ROC graph as a means to overcome the limitations of CA and CC indices in educational assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%