2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00086.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic utility of computed tomography imaging in equine intracranial conditions

Abstract: CT was an excellent neurodiagnostic tool in identifying skull fractures, intracranial space-occupying lesions (e.g. neoplasia) and acute haemorrhage and allows to rule in intracranial disorders. However, CT showed limited sensitivity in identifying inflammatory disorders and small parenchymal lesions in the equine brain, which was not further detectable after contrast administration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…administration of ICM with CT (usually via the jugular vein) is used to evaluate the equine skull [39,40]. Low case numbers likely biased this conclusion as multiple equine reports agree that contrast-enhanced CT provides more information about lesion aetiology than precontrast CT [41][42][43][44]. Low case numbers likely biased this conclusion as multiple equine reports agree that contrast-enhanced CT provides more information about lesion aetiology than precontrast CT [41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Techniques/usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…administration of ICM with CT (usually via the jugular vein) is used to evaluate the equine skull [39,40]. Low case numbers likely biased this conclusion as multiple equine reports agree that contrast-enhanced CT provides more information about lesion aetiology than precontrast CT [41][42][43][44]. Low case numbers likely biased this conclusion as multiple equine reports agree that contrast-enhanced CT provides more information about lesion aetiology than precontrast CT [41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Techniques/usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of contrastenhanced CT over precontrast CT has been questioned [41]. Inflammation, sinonasal neoplasia, ethmoid haematomas, parapharyngeal aneurysms and abscess capsules typically enhance (Fig 2) [39][40][41][45][46][47][48]; although cholesterinic granulomata may [42,43], or may not [41] contrast-enhance. Inflammation, sinonasal neoplasia, ethmoid haematomas, parapharyngeal aneurysms and abscess capsules typically enhance (Fig 2) [39][40][41][45][46][47][48]; although cholesterinic granulomata may [42,43], or may not [41] contrast-enhance.…”
Section: Techniques/usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the aetiology could not be determined more precisely and considering the interictal signs of amaurosis present, due to a forebrain lesion most likely acquired, the authors assumed a case of acquired epilepsy. In horses, MRI is more sensitive for detecting cranial disorders associated with seizures than CT (Sogaro and others 2009, Lacombe and others 2010) and could have given interesting information about the intracranial lesion, even though in another study on seizures in horses only 2 out of 31 cases had detectable abnormalities in MRI of the head (Manso-Díaz and others 2014). MRI or CT have not been performed in this case because of limited availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%