“…However, sensitivities among commercially available tests for non-Lp1 LD are highly variable and generally much lower than those for Lp1-associated disease when assayed with urine from patients with confirmed LD (267,(270)(271)(272)(273)(274)(275). Importantly, the sensitivities of most similar-format UATs are generally equivalent, regardless of the manufacturer (267)(268)(269)(276)(277)(278)(279), and they all allow for rapid assessment and patient treatment (280)(281)(282), unlike culture or serology, which may take days to weeks (139). Overall, the card-based ICT is a rapid, simple, qualitative assay for basic laboratory or POC use, while the EIA format is quantitative, may offer comparatively higher sensitivity and specificity, and is more suited for larger clinical, reference, or research laboratories (283).…”