2014
DOI: 10.1177/1049732314549813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Technologies in Practice

Abstract: Diagnosing HIV-positive gay men through enhanced testing technologies that detect acute HIV infection (AHI) or recent HIV infection provides opportunities for individual and population health benefits. We recruited 25 men in British Columbia who received an acute (n = 13) or recent (n = 12) HIV diagnosis to engage in a longitudinal multiple-methods study over one year or longer. Our thematic analysis of baseline qualitative interviews revealed insights within men’s accounts of technologically mediated processe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The men we spoke with argued that more equitable policy would be one more aligned with sound scientific evidence. However, participants tended to speak somewhat more favourably of a 3-month deferral policy, in part because this timeframe matched the typical window period from infection to seroconversion that has become normalized in HIV testing practices [40, 41]. While moves towards a 3-month deferral were viewed as positive by some participants—apparent stepping stones on a road to equity—the majority still considered any policy that maintained a MSM-specific deferral as representing a form of “othering” and being discriminatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The men we spoke with argued that more equitable policy would be one more aligned with sound scientific evidence. However, participants tended to speak somewhat more favourably of a 3-month deferral policy, in part because this timeframe matched the typical window period from infection to seroconversion that has become normalized in HIV testing practices [40, 41]. While moves towards a 3-month deferral were viewed as positive by some participants—apparent stepping stones on a road to equity—the majority still considered any policy that maintained a MSM-specific deferral as representing a form of “othering” and being discriminatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like US studies, our participants were uninformed about the high transmission potential during AHI. 2022 Such understanding is critical because some MSM would change their behavior following AHI diagnosis to prevent onward HIV transmission in other studies, 13 and our participants predicted that others would as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…8,12,2022 Knowledge of symptoms is crucial because they could motivate AHI testing following high-risk sex. One of the largest studies about AHI found confusion surrounding the various HIV testing window periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meta-theme highlights diagnosis as an emotive time, sometimes accompanied by anxiety or confusion generated by negative or indeterminate test results. Testing and uncertainty around result Diagnosis during AHI can be complicated by negative or indeterminate HIV antibody test results leading to confusion [22,29], mistrust of the diagnosis [29], and anxiety precipitated by healthcare providers' (HCP) own uncertainty [30]. In one study, some participants accessed confirmatory testing soon after diagnosis, while others first processed fears and concerns [28].…”
Section: Hiv Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual behaviour change following diagnosis was discussed in seven articles [18,21,23,[29][30][31][32]. Some reported sexual risk reduction to prevent onward transmission, while others demonstrated no behaviour modification as participants adjusted to their diagnosis.…”
Section: Sexual Behaviour Changementioning
confidence: 99%