2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11914-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
202
1
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
202
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the overall exclusion rate in this study was acceptable (12%) and is lower than that reported in many large multi-center trials [5,6,11]. We believe that these two points compensate for the limitation caused by the study design as a single-center trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the overall exclusion rate in this study was acceptable (12%) and is lower than that reported in many large multi-center trials [5,6,11]. We believe that these two points compensate for the limitation caused by the study design as a single-center trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, most of these strategies are complicated and involve multiple rounds of tests and are thus time consuming, costly and difficult to apply in clinical practice [5,6,9,11,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In management trials, this approach resulted in a low false-negative rate (1.0%-1.8% at 3-month follow-up). [11][12][13][14] However, the rate of major bleeding in patients treated for PE was 3.2%-6.0% at 3 months, [12][13][14] illustrating the potential risk of anticoagulating patients who may have false-positive diagnoses. Furthermore, premature diagnostic closure after a CTPA "positive for PE" may result in additional morbidity as a result of missing the true diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Plasma D-dimer testing is not routinely used at our hospitals, but it is a component of some CTPAbased diagnostic algorithms. [11][12][13][14] Although use of D-dimer testing may have led to fewer scans in patients with negative D-dimer test results and low pretest probability, 30 the high false-positive rate for D-dimer assays 31 makes it difficult to predict the effect of widespread D-dimer use on the overall pretest probability distribution. Using our assumptions about CT test characteristics, a pretest probability of more than 30% is required to generate a posttest probability of PE of at least 90% (the traditional treatment threshold for anticoagulant therapy 22 ) with a positive scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%