Diagnostic strategies in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Dolan, James G.; Bordley, Donald R.; Miller, Heidi B.

doi:10.1007/bf02599632

Cited by 28 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In these circumstances the AHP can help to facilitate shared decision making by providing a way to explicitly characterize and discuss the otherwise implicit preferences and opinions. The AHP has been successfully applied to a variety of medical decisions 29–35 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions¹

Dolan

2005

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions¹

Dolan

2005

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A second major finding was that it was not hard for ordinary patients and physicians to complete successfully a moderately complex AHP analysis. 23…”

Section: The Ahp and Medical Decision Makingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared decision-making – transferring research into practice: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Dolan

2008

Patient Education and Counseling

146

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective-To illustrate how the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) can be used to promote shared decision-making and enhance clinician-patient communication. Methods-Tutorial review.Results-The AHP promotes shared decision making by creating a framework that is used to define the decision, summarize the information available, prioritize information needs, elicit preferences and values, and foster meaningful communication among decision stakeholders.Conclusions-The AHP and related multi-criteria methods have the potential for improving the quality of clinical decisions and overcoming current barriers to implementing shared decision making in busy clinical settings. Further research is needed to determine the best way to implement these tools and to determine their effectiveness.Practice Implications-Many clinical decisions involve preference-based trade-offs between competing risks and benefits. The AHP is a well-developed method that provides a practical approach for improving patient-provider communication, clinical decision-making, and the quality of patient care in these situations.

show abstract

“…However, studies show this may not be the case,18 19 and many health professionals have a poor understanding of their patients' views 20…”

Section: Objections To Lay Involvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lay perspectives: advantages for health research

Entwistle

Renfrew

Yearley

et al. 1998

BMJ

304

271

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although involvement of the consumer is increasingly being advocated in health related research, it is not welcome universally. Furthermore, the underlying rationale is rarely made explicit. Policy makers, health care professionals, and researchers need to be clear about the benefits and ways of including lay perspectives and the criteria for evaluating these. Examples of lay involvement in setting research agendas, [1][2][3][4] methodological debate, 5 and specific projects 4 6 7 are accumulating, but little clear evidence about the benefits and costs of different ways of incorporating lay input into health services research is available.We outline two basic reasons for incorporating lay perspectives into research and discuss some common objections. A framework is offered to help clarify the dimensions of lay involvement in health research. We use the term "lay" to mean people who are neither health care professionals nor health services researchers, but who may have specialised knowledge related to health. This includes patients, the general public, and consumer advocates.

show abstract

Diagnostic strategies in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Cited by 28 publications

References 26 publications

Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions¹

Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions¹

Shared decision-making – transferring research into practice: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Lay perspectives: advantages for health research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Diagnostic strategies in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Cited by 28 publications

References 26 publications

Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions1

Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions1

Shared decision-making – transferring research into practice: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Lay perspectives: advantages for health research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions¹

Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions¹