2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-003-0436-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic score in appendicitis

Abstract: The Eskelinen score delivered acceptable clinical results only after calibration to a cut-off value of 57. The data from this study suggest the investigation of whether a calibrated score might be particularly instrumental in the pre-admission evaluation of the patient in whom appendicitis is suspected.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical and computer-aided scoring systems have been shown to increase the diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary appendicectomies in adults [8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, diagnostic scores abstracted from adults' data have not been found to be useful in children [8,12], and, to our knowledge, only one study has addressed the issue of a prognostic scoring system unique to children with suspected appendicitis [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Clinical and computer-aided scoring systems have been shown to increase the diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary appendicectomies in adults [8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, diagnostic scores abstracted from adults' data have not been found to be useful in children [8,12], and, to our knowledge, only one study has addressed the issue of a prognostic scoring system unique to children with suspected appendicitis [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1). Th e possible reason for these diff erences could be diff erent geographical settings of these two studies 8 . In order to improve diagnostic accuracy, several easy to use scoring systems have been developed and tested 3,4,14,15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th is was the reason for developing new scoring systems and their re-evaluation in diff erent settings 16 . Age and gender are factors that infl uence clinical presentation of acute abdominal pain 4,7,8 . It is known that extreme age groups have a higher rate of perforation 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors further calculated these statistical variables using thresholds ranging from 50 to 60, and determined 57 to be the most favorable in their population. (Sitter, Hoffmann, Hassan, & Zielke, 2004) …”
Section: The Eskelinen Scorementioning
confidence: 99%