2016
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic rules and algorithms for the diagnosis of non-acute heart failure in patients 80 years of age and older: a diagnostic accuracy and validation study

Abstract: ObjectivesDifferent diagnostic algorithms for non-acute heart failure (HF) exist. Our aim was to compare the ability of these algorithms to identify HF in symptomatic patients aged 80 years and older and identify those patients at highest risk for mortality.DesignDiagnostic accuracy and validation study.SettingGeneral practice, Belgium.Participants365 patients with HF symptoms aged 80 years and older (BELFRAIL cohort). Participants underwent a full clinical assessment, including a detailed echocardiographic ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among 259 patients with elevated NT-proBNP who underwent echocardiogram, HF was present in only 68, so that as high as 73.7% of the referrals for echocardiogram could be considered as not necessary. 29 The 97.5% quantile levels identified in our sample of asymptomatic older adults with an optimal profile with respect to NT-proBNP predictors for those ≥70 were all above the recommended cut-offs. Recent data coming from the NT-proBNP reference values in older adults ICON-RELOADED Study, which aimed to validate the age-specific NT-proBNP cut-offs for rule-in of 450, 900, and 1800 ng/L for ages <50, 50 to 75, and 75 years, showed the least best performance with respect to sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio precisely among those with 75 years and older.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among 259 patients with elevated NT-proBNP who underwent echocardiogram, HF was present in only 68, so that as high as 73.7% of the referrals for echocardiogram could be considered as not necessary. 29 The 97.5% quantile levels identified in our sample of asymptomatic older adults with an optimal profile with respect to NT-proBNP predictors for those ≥70 were all above the recommended cut-offs. Recent data coming from the NT-proBNP reference values in older adults ICON-RELOADED Study, which aimed to validate the age-specific NT-proBNP cut-offs for rule-in of 450, 900, and 1800 ng/L for ages <50, 50 to 75, and 75 years, showed the least best performance with respect to sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio precisely among those with 75 years and older.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, the specificity was as low as 34%. Among 259 patients with elevated NT‐proBNP who underwent echocardiogram, HF was present in only 68, so that as high as 73.7% of the referrals for echocardiogram could be considered as not necessary 29 . The 97.5% quantile levels identified in our sample of asymptomatic older adults with an optimal profile with respect to NT‐proBNP predictors for those ≥70 were all above the recommended cut‐offs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This is an issue that HF guideline developers should consider 1 18. NT-proBNP could support GPs in this risk stratification, as it provides prognostic information in cardiac outpatients 1 3 20 28 29. Additionally, in our study, the concepts of HFrEF and HFpEF were cited by very few GPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The paradigm shift to an earlier risk assessment should be more widely disseminated in practice. However, access to natriuretic peptides is indispensable to achieve this 1 22 28 29. The main modifiable barrier for further investigations in this study is not, as formerly described, a lack of access or a pure lack of knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For each CV that was obtained by the 3 methods, we classified subjects as having high values (high physical fitness group: High Group) or low values (low physical fitness group: Low Group), and we developed a cumulative CLTC curve using the Kaplan-Meier method [17]. We analyzed the differences between the cumulative CLTC curves for the High and Low Groups with the log rank test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%