2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41525-022-00347-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic potential of the amniotic fluid cells transcriptome in deciphering mendelian disease: a proof-of-concept

Abstract: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is emerging in genetic diagnoses as it provides functional support for the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance. However, the use of amniotic fluid (AF) cells for RNA-seq has not yet been explored. Here, we examined the expression of clinically relevant genes in AF cells (n = 48) compared with whole blood and fibroblasts. The number of well-expressed genes in AF cells was comparable to that in fibroblasts and much higher than that in blood across different disease categ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, individuals harboring low-penetrance RB1 PSVs (eg, splice-site and missense SVs) developed bilateral retinoblastoma later than patients with null PSVs . Molecular screening methods (eg, RNA sequencing of amniotic fluid cells) have enabled clinicians to assess whether a specific RB1 SV is likely to be associated with any phenotypic manifestations . However, there currently are no clinically acceptable predictive parameters to better define the phenotypic expression of RB1 PSV carriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, individuals harboring low-penetrance RB1 PSVs (eg, splice-site and missense SVs) developed bilateral retinoblastoma later than patients with null PSVs . Molecular screening methods (eg, RNA sequencing of amniotic fluid cells) have enabled clinicians to assess whether a specific RB1 SV is likely to be associated with any phenotypic manifestations . However, there currently are no clinically acceptable predictive parameters to better define the phenotypic expression of RB1 PSV carriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Molecular screening methods (eg, RNA sequencing of amniotic fluid cells) have enabled clinicians to assess whether a specific RB1 SV is likely to be associated with any phenotypic manifestations. 10 However, there currently are no clinically acceptable predictive parameters to better define the phenotypic expression of RB1 PSV carriers. The case presented herein reports an incidental RB1 PSV detected on unrelated genetic testing, posing a clinical and ethical dilemma to both clinician and family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, non‐invasive biospecimens for transcriptomic approach recently got more attention. Lee et al examined the potential of RNA‐seq from amniotic fluid cells for prenatal diagnostics 29 . They identified a high similarity of gene expression profiles to fibroblasts and provided a diagnosis to 4 patients (8%).…”
Section: Transcriptomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was successfully applied as a complementary approach to WES and WGS in more than 18 studies (Table S2). There are multiple case reports in which RNA‐sequencing (RNA‐seq) provided the necessary functional evidence to support a molecular diagnosis 24–39 . Transcriptomics can be used for VUS reclassification and for prioritisation of overlooked likely pathogenic variants.…”
Section: Transcriptomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying splicing aberrations on RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data provides more direct evidence of the presence of splicing defects and reveals the resulting transcript isoforms. This approach has been successfully used to diagnose patients with rare genetic disorders in large cohorts (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Following this initial success, computational tools specialized on detecting aberrant splicing from RNA-seq data have been developed including LeafcutterMD (21), SPOT (22), and FRASER (23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%