2017
DOI: 10.7554/elife.28932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic potential for a serum miRNA neural network for detection of ovarian cancer

Abstract: Recent studies posit a role for non-coding RNAs in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Combining small RNA sequencing from 179 human serum samples with a neural network analysis produced a miRNA algorithm for diagnosis of EOC (AUC 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81–0.99). The model significantly outperformed CA125 and functioned well regardless of patient age, histology, or stage. Among 454 patients with various diagnoses, the miRNA neural network had 100% specificity for ovarian cancer. After using 325 samples to adapt the neur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive miRNA profiling for breast cancer that has been conducted thus far, with a total of 180 malignant and benign breast lesions screened for the expression of 2,083 miRNA transcripts. To date, only a few cancer studies have deployed NGS as a tool in circulating miRNA biomarker discovery [47,48], with none reported for breast cancer. NGS was chosen as the profiling platform in this study due to its high-throughput capabilities and superior detection sensitivity as compared to other methods such as microarray and real-time qRT-PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive miRNA profiling for breast cancer that has been conducted thus far, with a total of 180 malignant and benign breast lesions screened for the expression of 2,083 miRNA transcripts. To date, only a few cancer studies have deployed NGS as a tool in circulating miRNA biomarker discovery [47,48], with none reported for breast cancer. NGS was chosen as the profiling platform in this study due to its high-throughput capabilities and superior detection sensitivity as compared to other methods such as microarray and real-time qRT-PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of several variables, such as the detection in plasma or serum, centrifugation parameters, anticoagulants used for blood collection, methods for RNA extraction and amplification, as well as different methods of patients'stratification, determine a variability in the detection of miR expression levels. Indeed, a robust validation of methodology to detect them needs to be standardized before introducing it as a routine laboratory test [73] to guide clinical decision making., Moreover, standardized systems of big data analysis and management should be set up for data interpretation [178], the development of neural network based software could help the interpretation of the miRNA signature of specific patients [179].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like in classical flow cytometry, the biotin is labeled with a streptavidin reporter complex that will be read in a cytometer. The fluorescent intensities of each coded particle will indicate the miRNA expression level (Elias et al, 2017;Leng et al, 2018). Multiplexed microarray profiling was used to identify let-7b and miR-199a as the most significant discriminators associated with metastasis in uveal melanoma, and the results were validated by qPCR (Worley et al, 2008).…”
Section: Mirna Multiplexing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%