2016
DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.175879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic potency of EUS-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions

Abstract: Background and Objectives:Diagnosis of pancreatic lesions remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic mass lesions.Patients and Methods:Clinical data, laboratory tests, and cytopathological and imaging reports were collected from 185 pancreatic EUS cases performed from March 2010 to January 2014. The final diagnosis was based on surgical findings, EUS-FNA or computed tomography (CT)-guided biop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adequate biopsy is still challenging because of its poor anatomic location. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is preferred for obtaining specimens for biopsy, yet its negative predictive value remains at 16-86% (Mohammad Alizadeh et al, 2016). Currently, the serum level of CA 19-9 is a widely used biomarker for the diagnosis or monitoring of PDAC, but CA19-9 alone exhibits a wide range of sensitivity (70-95%) and specificity (70-90%) (Ballehaninna and Chamberlain, 2012;Scara et al, 2015).…”
Section: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate biopsy is still challenging because of its poor anatomic location. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is preferred for obtaining specimens for biopsy, yet its negative predictive value remains at 16-86% (Mohammad Alizadeh et al, 2016). Currently, the serum level of CA 19-9 is a widely used biomarker for the diagnosis or monitoring of PDAC, but CA19-9 alone exhibits a wide range of sensitivity (70-95%) and specificity (70-90%) (Ballehaninna and Chamberlain, 2012;Scara et al, 2015).…”
Section: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is able to directly extract the pancreatic tissue (3). Therefore, as it is difficult to distinguish the nature of pancreatic mass using computer tomography (CT) and EUS (4,5), EUS-FNA technology is a good option (6,7). In recent years, with the rapid development of molecular biology and high-throughput sequencing, it is possible to screen molecular markers for pancreatic cancer at the levels of genome, transcriptome and proteome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging is very important in the workup of periampullary cancers and is noninvasive. Mohammad Alizadeh et al [12] and Kamisawa et al [13] both found that EUS and EUS-guided FNA had good diagnostic efficacy, 85% accuracy and high sensitivity for pancreatic for cancer. Ibrahim et al [14] reported that EUS-guided FNA was not sufficiently sensitive to identify low-grade intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, mucinous cystic neoplasm, or serous cystadenoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%