2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0209-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for gastrointestinal pathology: state of the art from basics to advanced

Abstract: The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by non-radiologists has dramatically increased. POCUS is completely different from the routine radiological studies. POCUS is a Physiological, On spot, extension of the Clinical examination, that is Unique, and Safe. This review aims to lay the basic principles of using POCUS in diagnosing intestinal pathologies so as to encourage acute care physicians to learn and master this important tool. It will be a useful primer for clinicians who want to introduce POCUS into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Symptoms, signs and laboratory tests are not accurate for diagnosis [1,2]. Nowadays, the abdominal pain workup in the ED is based on a combination of clinical assessment and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), aiming to increase diagnostic accuracy and to reduce the time to diagnosis, ED length of stay and the number of computed tomography (CT) scan requests [3,4]. In specific conditions, such as suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm, biliary and renal pathologies, pregnancy-related disorders and appendicitis, there are consolidated protocols that imply the systematic use of POCUS as an initial screening tool [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms, signs and laboratory tests are not accurate for diagnosis [1,2]. Nowadays, the abdominal pain workup in the ED is based on a combination of clinical assessment and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), aiming to increase diagnostic accuracy and to reduce the time to diagnosis, ED length of stay and the number of computed tomography (CT) scan requests [3,4]. In specific conditions, such as suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm, biliary and renal pathologies, pregnancy-related disorders and appendicitis, there are consolidated protocols that imply the systematic use of POCUS as an initial screening tool [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, before the widespread utilisation of modern diagnostic imaging techniques, in particular CT and US, the diagnosis of EA was usually made during surgical exploration while searching for unexplained cause of acute abdomen. Nowadays, although normal epiploic appendages are usually not evident in radiological studies, they result visible in inflammatory conditions and can be definitively diagnosed by contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and US [3,[29][30][31]. Moreover, other advanced imaging techniques can be useful in the diagnosis of this disease such as dual-energy CT (DECT), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [20,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is rarely used for diagnosis. Abdominopelvic US and CT examinations do not allow seeing the normal epiploic appendices, unless there is surrounding intraperitoneal fluid [22]. In cases of acute epiploic appendagitis, US evaluation shows, in the patient's area of maximal tenderness, the presence of a small (2-4 cm in maximal diameter) rounded or ovoid, noncompressible, and hyperechoic mass adherent to the colonic wall, without internal blood flow on color or power Doppler studies, frequently surrounded by a subtle hypoechoic line [11, 16, 22, 23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%