2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01165-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic performance of thromboelastometry in trauma-induced coagulopathy: a comparison between two level I trauma centres using two different devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies have looked at optimal threshold values of the early FIBTEM parameters A5 and A10 to quickly determine if fibrinogen levels are below a critical point. One study found a similar threshold for A5 as we did (9.5 mm) to determine fibrinogen levels below 1.5 g/L in trauma patients [15], while other studies determined lower threshold levels (5, 6 or 7 mm) [12,20,22,23]. For A10, only one study in patients undergoing cardiac surgery determined the optimal cut-off value, which was similar to ours [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Multiple studies have looked at optimal threshold values of the early FIBTEM parameters A5 and A10 to quickly determine if fibrinogen levels are below a critical point. One study found a similar threshold for A5 as we did (9.5 mm) to determine fibrinogen levels below 1.5 g/L in trauma patients [15], while other studies determined lower threshold levels (5, 6 or 7 mm) [12,20,22,23]. For A10, only one study in patients undergoing cardiac surgery determined the optimal cut-off value, which was similar to ours [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…reported the diagnostic performance of thromboelastometry in trauma-induced coagulopathy in two separate trauma centres, one of which used the ROTEMdelta, and the other the ROTEMsigma. 27 The centre using the ROTEMdelta found that an A5 ≤6 mm had 85% sensitivity and 90% specificity for the identification of fibrinogen <1.5 g/l, which was similar to the other centre using a ROTEMsigma (sensitivity 83%, specificity 82%). They concluded that the same ROTEM-based algorithms for trauma-induced coagulopathy could be used for either device.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The latest version of either the ROTEM (RoTem Sigma (WERFEN) or the TEG device (TEG6 Haemonetics) will be used in the present study. Indeed, these new versions are associated with greater ease of use and the measured parameters closely correlate with those obtained from their predecessor 22–24. The choice of either the RoTem Sigma or the TEG6 Haemonetics has been left to the discretion of each participating centre before the beginning of the study.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%