2008
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.07.3414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Performance of Low-Dose CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that a low-dose CT protocol can be used as the initial imaging technique in the workup of patients with suspected urolithiasis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
136
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
136
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that CT, which was used in the present study to evaluate the success rate, is more sensitive for detecting renal stones than both US and plain radiography (96.6%, 45% and 44-77%, respectively). [17][18][19] Furthermore, the previous study used fragmentation and stone extraction with basket forceps, which we could not perform in our study because of lack of equipment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that CT, which was used in the present study to evaluate the success rate, is more sensitive for detecting renal stones than both US and plain radiography (96.6%, 45% and 44-77%, respectively). [17][18][19] Furthermore, the previous study used fragmentation and stone extraction with basket forceps, which we could not perform in our study because of lack of equipment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since pelvic organs (bladder, colon and gonads) account for a considerable part of the effective dose and are close to the center of pelvis, the effective dose should be lower in obese patients than in underweight ones. Hence, an increase in effective tube current settings in patients with a high BMI may not result in a higher effective radiation dose [15,17,22]. In our study, the highest effective dose (9.5mSv) in the low dose protocol was seen in an obese patient who underwent examination with an effective tube current of 175 mAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…16,24,25 Lowdose unenhanced CT appears to have emerged as the imaging modality of choice given its very low radiation, diagnostic performance similar to that of regular-dose unenhanced CT, and significantly better diagnostic performance than KUB/ultrasonography. 17 Finally, although the population with the greatest concerns regarding radiation exposure is women, this also appears to be the population with the highest rate of alternative diagnosis. In our sample, 10% of women had an alternative diagnosis on low-dose unenhanced CT compared to 5% of men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-dose CT has a radiation exposure that is slightly higher than that of KUB radiography and significantly less than that of IVP or regular-dose CT. 16 Its diagnostic performance has been found to be similar to that of regular unenhanced CT. 17 …”
Section: Ré Sumémentioning
confidence: 99%