2016
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Performance of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) for Non-Calcific Chronic Pancreatitis (NCCP) Based on Histopathology

Abstract: Correlation between standard EUS features and histopathology is poor in NCCP. MPD irregularity is an independent predictor for NCCP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One study showed EUS has good efficacy in diagnosing early non-calcific CP with sensitivity and specificity of 90.5 and 85.7%, respectively, when compared to histopathology using at least four EUS criteria [87]. However, in another study examining patients with abdominal pain and non-calcific CP requiring total pancreatectomy and islet auto-transplantation, sensitivity of 61% was found [90]. Another caveat is that both EUS findings of CP as well as histopathologic features of CP are found in several conditions without symptomatic clinical presentations.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Chronic Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study showed EUS has good efficacy in diagnosing early non-calcific CP with sensitivity and specificity of 90.5 and 85.7%, respectively, when compared to histopathology using at least four EUS criteria [87]. However, in another study examining patients with abdominal pain and non-calcific CP requiring total pancreatectomy and islet auto-transplantation, sensitivity of 61% was found [90]. Another caveat is that both EUS findings of CP as well as histopathologic features of CP are found in several conditions without symptomatic clinical presentations.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Chronic Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), which can evaluate the pancreatic parenchyma at high resolution, has been used to assess the severity of CP by evaluating the number of characteristic EUS features, using the Rosemont classification (RC), which was proposed in 2009 to identify consensus‐based EUS criteria for the diagnosis of CP, or Japan Pancreas Society clinical diagnostic criteria 2009 (JPS criteria) . EUS‐based diagnosis of CP is widely used at clinical sites, but it has several limitations including low reproducibility, the subjective criteria of diagnosing these EUS features, and the difficulty of correlating these EUS features with histological features of CP …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ≥4 EUS features provided the best balance of sensitivity (61%) and specificity (75%) for predicting a FS ≥ 2. (26) This study suggests that current EUS criteria are not adequate to diagnose non-calcific CP. Another question from this study is whether current selection criteria for TPIAT are adequate.…”
Section: Imaging Update: Endoscopic Ultrasound (Eus)mentioning
confidence: 78%