2021
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7019a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Performance of an Antigen Test with RT-PCR for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a Hospital Setting — Los Angeles County, California, June–August 2020

Abstract: Prompt and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has been important during public health responses for containing the spread of COVID-19, including in hospital settings (1-3). In vitro diagnostic nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), such as real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) can be expensive, have relatively long turnaround times, and require experienced laboratory personnel.* Antigen detection tests can be rapidly and more easily performed and ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we recognize that the outcome in this study is a positive test which is not definitive proof of infection. Given that the majority of tests were PCR tests, which have high sensitivity and specificity if performed correctly, we believe this to be a sufficient stand-in for SARS-CoV-2 infection [ 35 ]. Another limitation is that the most recent data for air pollution was collected in 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we recognize that the outcome in this study is a positive test which is not definitive proof of infection. Given that the majority of tests were PCR tests, which have high sensitivity and specificity if performed correctly, we believe this to be a sufficient stand-in for SARS-CoV-2 infection [ 35 ]. Another limitation is that the most recent data for air pollution was collected in 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT-PCR is an excellent tool for more precisely identifying normal categories. Additionally, the approach reliably identifies COVID-positive people, with classification accuracy ranging from 65 to 95 percent [30]. While the standard RTPCR-based approach accurately predicts normal categories, COVID patients' risk is unnoticed.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many challenges, however, still remain in the COVID-19 detection research. The RT-PCR sensitivity rate is 60–70%, and the test is expensive [ 7 ]. Antigen detection tests, or commonly known as rapid COVID tests, are fairly accurate in detecting positive cases but the false negative rate of the test is high and the sensitivity of the test is low (60.5%) [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%