2018
DOI: 10.1177/1550059418767584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Performance and Utility of Quantitative EEG Analyses in Delirium: Confirmatory Results From a Large Retrospective Case-Control Study

Abstract: This retrospective study yielded preliminary evidence that qEEG provides excellent diagnostic performance to identify delirious patients even outside confined study environments. It furthermore revealed reduced beta power as a novel specific finding in delirium and that a normal EEG excludes delirium. Prospective studies including parameters of pretest probability and delirium severity are required to elaborate on these promising findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a cohort of non-sedated cardiothoracic surgery patients, eyes-closed EEG recording with two electrodes in a frontal-parietal derivation could distinguish delirious from non-delirious patients 246 . In a retro spective case-control study, quantitative EEG could distinguish delirious from non-delirious patients with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% 247 . While advances in neuro-functional imaging and neurophysiology are likely to expand our understanding of delirium pathophysiology and the mechanistic basis of possible future treatments, the role of EEG in delirium screening and diagnosis remains undefined.…”
Section: Clinical Investigations Of Deliriummentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a cohort of non-sedated cardiothoracic surgery patients, eyes-closed EEG recording with two electrodes in a frontal-parietal derivation could distinguish delirious from non-delirious patients 246 . In a retro spective case-control study, quantitative EEG could distinguish delirious from non-delirious patients with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% 247 . While advances in neuro-functional imaging and neurophysiology are likely to expand our understanding of delirium pathophysiology and the mechanistic basis of possible future treatments, the role of EEG in delirium screening and diagnosis remains undefined.…”
Section: Clinical Investigations Of Deliriummentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Neurophysiological correlates of delirium have been studied using EEG and quantitative EEG in small cohorts of patients 246,247 . In a cohort of non-sedated cardiothoracic surgery patients, eyes-closed EEG recording with two electrodes in a frontal-parietal derivation could distinguish delirious from non-delirious patients 246 .…”
Section: Clinical Investigations Of Deliriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median EEG duration was 0.5 hours (0.3-30). The majority of patients (64%) were under continuous sedation during EEG, with propofol and/or midazolam; their median duration of mechanical ventilation was 8 days (4-14) and the median ICU stay was 11 days (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG is part of standard diagnostic procedures of acute alteration of consciousness in the ICU, and may therefore prove useful to contribute to delirium diagnosis (7)(8)(9). Yet, clinical data on EEG in ICU delirium is limited (10,11), and to our knowledge, a comprehensive analysis of EEG characteristics in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients at high delirium risk has not been explored so far, especially in adults without known acute brain injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chart-based methods can furthermore increase the overall sensitivity when combined with interview methods in the first 72 hours, yet their sensitivity tends to be lower in the absence of psychomotor agitation or inappropriate behaviour when used stand-alone (49). (11,68). A recent review found that most research in the field was done in cardiovascular surgery or ICU patients limiting the generalizability of previous findings (67).…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%