2018
DOI: 10.1111/odi.12839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic patterns and delays in autoimmune blistering diseases of the mouth: A cross‐sectional study

Abstract: Diagnosis of oral blistering diseases is often delayed. Diagnostic delay is more common in patients presenting with desquamative gingivitis and those with less severe disease. Improving patients and healthcare professionals' awareness about oral blistering diseases might help reduce diagnostic delay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this fact it is not always possible to relate DG to a previous diagnosis, it is important that the oral health specialists know its concept to be able to distinguish between a classic inflammatory gingivitis and DG associated to dental plaque. The magnitude of DG is based on the high delay of its pathogenic diagnosis, approximately 83.2 days (29). Because of that the physician must identify, not only the clinical description of its erythema, erosion and/or blisters presence, but it must also be accompanied by conventional microscopic study and immunofluorescence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this fact it is not always possible to relate DG to a previous diagnosis, it is important that the oral health specialists know its concept to be able to distinguish between a classic inflammatory gingivitis and DG associated to dental plaque. The magnitude of DG is based on the high delay of its pathogenic diagnosis, approximately 83.2 days (29). Because of that the physician must identify, not only the clinical description of its erythema, erosion and/or blisters presence, but it must also be accompanied by conventional microscopic study and immunofluorescence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These immune-mediated diseases could be characterized by muco-cutaneous involvement and chronic course [4]. However, almost one third of the patients present primarily only gingival involvement in the form of DG which remains under-diagnosed for a longer time [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por esto, no siempre es posible relacionar la DG con un diagnóstico previo, es importante que los especialistas en salud oral conozcan su concepto para poder distinguir entre una gingivitis inflamatoria clásica y una DG asociada con la placa dental. 15 El médico debe identificar no sólo la descripción clínica de su presencia de eritema, erosión y/o ampollas, sino que también debe hacer un estudio microscópico convencional e inmunofluorescencia. Este hecho requiere que el médico especialista, Este documento es elaborado por Medigraphic generalmente en patología oral, realice la biopsia en el área apropiada, con el propósito de proyectar el diagnóstico histopatológico e inmunológico de la lesión.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified