1952
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1952.9710651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Implications of a Study in Time Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lengthening effect occurred across all treatment conditions, although the effect was stronger in the 5-sec timing conditions than in the 2-sec timing conditions. The lengthening effect represents a judgment bias that has been observed in many other studies involving serial productions (Eson & Kafka, 1952;Falk & Bindra, 1954;Hicks & Allen, 1979;Ross, 1969;Sheetman, 1970;M. Treisman, 1963).…”
Section: Summary Of Timing Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lengthening effect occurred across all treatment conditions, although the effect was stronger in the 5-sec timing conditions than in the 2-sec timing conditions. The lengthening effect represents a judgment bias that has been observed in many other studies involving serial productions (Eson & Kafka, 1952;Falk & Bindra, 1954;Hicks & Allen, 1979;Ross, 1969;Sheetman, 1970;M. Treisman, 1963).…”
Section: Summary Of Timing Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the lack of any significant trend differences betweenSI and IPSA, the above proposal was supported here. While other authors (Falk & Bindra, 1954;Eson & Kaffka, 1952) have reported linear lengthening, none have sought to determine the extent of the phemonenon. Treisman found lengthening highly irregular, sometimes greater in the beginning, sometimes greater later on in a series of trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Eson & Kaffka (1952) and Falk & Bindra (1954) reported tendencies for length of time productions to increase over sequential trials. Several authors (Rosenzweig & Koht, 1933;Langer, Wapner, & Werner, 1961;Hawkes, Joy, & Evans, 1961;Thor, 1962) have obtained lengthened time estimates in experimental conditions which assumedly lead to increases in arousal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for each of these five estimations were analyzed independently, that is, for each of the ten sessions the three medications were compared for each of the five independent estimations. It has been found in other investigations that subjects tend to overestimate the duration of a temporal interval (Eson & Kafka, 1952;Falk & Bindra, 1954;Treisman, 1963). If they are asked to depress a button switch for a given period of time, the duration of the period produced by pressing the button tends to exceed the duration requested.…”
Section: Time Estimation Testmentioning
confidence: 98%