2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for Müllerian Anomalies: The Case for a New Gold Standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
29
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of endometrial cavity can be performed by ultrasonography, contrasted hysterosalgingography (HSG), and diagnostic hysteroscopy (HCT) [2]. Diagnostic hysteroscopy is considered the gold standard for assessing endometrial pathologies and congenital uterine anomalies [3]; however, it is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure [4]. Compared with diagnostic hysteroscopy, saline contrast HSG is a noninvasive procedure with similar accuracy in the diagnosis of focal endometrial pathology [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of endometrial cavity can be performed by ultrasonography, contrasted hysterosalgingography (HSG), and diagnostic hysteroscopy (HCT) [2]. Diagnostic hysteroscopy is considered the gold standard for assessing endometrial pathologies and congenital uterine anomalies [3]; however, it is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure [4]. Compared with diagnostic hysteroscopy, saline contrast HSG is a noninvasive procedure with similar accuracy in the diagnosis of focal endometrial pathology [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karyotyping/chromosome analysis, laparoscopic examination, hormonal status and ultrasonography provide the physicians an insight into the complexity of the anatomical defect in the MRKH syndrome patients (ACOG, 2006(ACOG, , 2013. Further, patients may undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis, ultrasound examination of vagina, or ovarian biopsy for further investigations (Valappil et al, 2012;Bermejo et al, 2010;Rousset et al, 2013;Berger et al, 2014).…”
Section: Types and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on their abnormalities, MRKH syndrome patients are usually listed in one of the following four classification systems: (1) European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classification (ESHRE/ESGE) (Berger et al, 2014;Grimbizis et al, 2013); (2) Vagina, Cervix, Uterus, Adnex and associated Malformation (VCUAM) classification (Berger et al, 2014;Oppelt et al, 2007;Walther, 2011); (3) American Fertility Society/American Society of Reproductive Medicine (AFS/ASRM) classification (Bermejo et al, 2010;Berger et al, 2014;AFS, 1988;Grimbizis and Campo, 2010); and (4) Embryological-Clinical classification systems (Grimbizis and Campo, 2010;Acién et al, 2004;Acien and Acien, 2011) (Table 1). This categorization helps in evaluating the patient's diagnosis and treatment options.…”
Section: Types and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urogenital sinus develops and lack of exposure to androgens allows regression of wolffian ducts and further development of m€ ullerian ducts [12][13][14] M€ ullerian ducts fuse with urogenital sinus [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Cephalic growth of sinovaginal bulb occurs [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] After cephalic growth occurs, fusion of sinovaginal bulb will help form the vaginal plate. Subsequently, canalization of the vagina occurs.…”
Section: Primary Amenorrhea Due To An Obstructed Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a higher rate of endometriosis, hematosalpinx, and pelvic inflammatory disease in these patients, due to the obstruction, so accurate diagnosis and surgical treatment or suppression is indicated. 23,25,26 …”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%