2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic dilemma's: The congenital disorders of glycosylation are clinical chameleons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is rather intriguing that many children with ARCL II present with glycosylation anomalies, and others with the same phenotype do not show any metabolic alteration, supporting genetic heterogeneity in AR cutis laxa syndrome. 53 The phenotypic variability regarding growth and development in different patients could be the consequence of consanguinity. However, these findings underline even more the usefulness of glycosylation studies in the diagnosis of ARCL II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is rather intriguing that many children with ARCL II present with glycosylation anomalies, and others with the same phenotype do not show any metabolic alteration, supporting genetic heterogeneity in AR cutis laxa syndrome. 53 The phenotypic variability regarding growth and development in different patients could be the consequence of consanguinity. However, these findings underline even more the usefulness of glycosylation studies in the diagnosis of ARCL II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, progeroid type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, progeroid type is a congenital disorder of glycosylation, such as type II AR cutis laxa. 45 As its name suggests, this type of EDS may be characterized by a distinctive progeroid facies as well as facial skin wrinkling, fine curly hair, scanty eyebrows and eyelashes, and downslanting palpebral fissures. Developmental delay and skeletal abnormalities are also typical.…”
Section: Ehlers-danlos Syndrome Kyphoscoliotic Type (Eds Type Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is a continuing debate [4] about another change of the CDG classification 10 years after the first change in 1999 [82]. This is reasonable, as the chronological notation of CDG does not follow a biochemical or clinical logic, and is increasingly confusing, especially concerning CDG type II, tissue-specific CDG, O-glycosylation disorders and combined N-and O-glycosylation disorders [83]. One proposal for a new classification was made recently by Jaeken et al, who discussed naming any glycosylation disorder by the term CDG and adding the name of the enzyme and/or gene [4].…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%