The story of Nadia Popovici, a medical student who spotted a suspicious-looking mole on the neck of a hockey team manager in Canada, made headlines worldwide. 1 The unsuspecting manager was unaware of this lesion, which turned out to be a melanoma. Ms. Popovici shared her unsolicited suspicions with this manager, urging him to seek medical attention. After that, she reconsidered her actions, questioning whether it was appropriate for her to bring this up. After the lesion was removed, the manager and the team posted a tweet online looking for the person who alerted the manager. After finding Nadia, the team conveyed their gratitude. This captivating story went viral and was picked up by major news organizations. Ms. Popovici's actions received overwhelmingly positive feedback from the public. 1 This illustrates a recurrent medical-ethical issue called "unsolicited medical opinion" (UMO). The paradigmatic examples are from dermatology. 2,3 A timely diagnosis of melanoma may have direct implications for a person's life. The issue of a UMO also arises in movement disorders. Consider a neurologist encountering an unknown person outside the examination room and incidentally noticing an asymmetrically reduced arm swing and a subtle resting tremor. Should he/she say something? How would this information be received? Would that benefit the person's health and well-being? Could the decision have medicolegal repercussions? And what would be the right way to approach the unsuspecting person?The question of whether to provide UMO to unknown passersby (ie, people with no degree of familiarity with the observer) often presents to experts in movement disorders. This raises ethical (and legal) questions. In standard medical ethics, questions involving moral duties, rights, virtues, and values are framed in the "patient-physician" relationship. In the context of a UMO, until the advice is given, such a relationship does not yet exist. Neurologists and other professionals will not always have the chance to do this at the very moment of the incidental observation, but it is important to justify their ethical decision afterward. Our position is that a justification based on intuition is not enough. In this article, we aim to explore the ethical considerations that should be weighed to justify one's decision concerning UMO in the field of movement disorders.
Neurological Observations Outside the ClinicThe issue of UMO in neurology may arise for several reasons. First, the art of neurological observation is sharpened through years of training and cannot be "turned off" outside the office. Secondly, the public usually expects physicians to have a moral responsibility to assist others, including people with whom they do not have an established professional relationship, for example, a medical emergency taking place on a plane. A physician's refusal to assist in such situations may even have legal repercussions, depending on the circumstances. 4 The issue of incidental observations outside the clinic is particularly relevant for movement...