Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic deep‐targeted next‐generation sequencing assessment of TP53 gene mutations in multiple myeloma from the whole bone marrow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The infiltration of myeloma cells in BM aspirates based on immunophenotyping was highly variable in enrolled patients (3–36%); more than 10% infiltration of plasma cells was found in the BM smears of all enrolled patients. The inter-individual variability in the myeloma cell infiltration may be linked to patchy or site-varied myeloma cell distribution, haemodilution, aspirate pull order, the aggregation of myeloma cells in aspirated BM, myeloma cell immunophenotypes and time-dependent losses of surface markers 23 , as well as disease heterogeneity itself 27 . The infiltration of myeloma cells in all samples after enrichment was > 80% (81–96%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The infiltration of myeloma cells in BM aspirates based on immunophenotyping was highly variable in enrolled patients (3–36%); more than 10% infiltration of plasma cells was found in the BM smears of all enrolled patients. The inter-individual variability in the myeloma cell infiltration may be linked to patchy or site-varied myeloma cell distribution, haemodilution, aspirate pull order, the aggregation of myeloma cells in aspirated BM, myeloma cell immunophenotypes and time-dependent losses of surface markers 23 , as well as disease heterogeneity itself 27 . The infiltration of myeloma cells in all samples after enrichment was > 80% (81–96%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full coding sequence of the TP53 gene (exons 2–11, plus 5′ and 3′UTR; NM_000546) and the hotspot regions in NRAS (exons 2–4; NM_002524), KRAS (exons 2–4; NM_004985) and BRAF (exons 11 and 15; NM_004333) were analysed by targeted, ultra-deep NGS, as reported previously 23 , 24 . Amplicon-based libraries were sequenced as paired ends on MiSeq (2 × 151 bp, Illumina, CA, USA), with a minimum target read depth of 5000×.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined with HIF it leads to mitochondrial impairment. P53 is a tumor suppressor and the deletion or mutation of the TP53 gene is considered as one of the most important negative prognostic factors in MM [ 77 ]. P53 is among the key regulators of cancer metabolism [ 78 , 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: The Transcription Factors Hif-1α C-myc and P53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, c-Myc regulates cancer cell glutamine metabolism by inducing the expression of ASCT2 and GLS1 ( 223 ). The tumor suppressor P53 is mutated in most cancer types, including MM, and its mutational status serves as a robust negative prognostic marker in myeloma ( 234 ). P53 suppresses glycolysis and thus favors OXPHOS via downregulation of GLUT1/4, and at the same time upregulates phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), a tumor suppressor gene, which inhibits the PI3K-Akt pathway.…”
Section: Metabolomic Reprogramming Of MM Within the Tmementioning
confidence: 99%