2016 International Conference on Emerging Technological Trends (ICETT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icett.2016.7873754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic data detection of faults in RAM using different march algorithms with BIST scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was achieved by dividing the test operations into two subgroups which are executed in parallel: M1: ⇑(w0); ⇑(r0, w1); ⇑(r1); ⇓(w0); ⇓(r0, w1); ⇓(r1) M2: ⇑(w1); ⇑(r1, w0); ⇑(r0); ⇓(w1); ⇓(r1, w0); ⇓(r0) By observing the proposed algorithm, it can be seen that M2 is exactly the complement of M1, and thus, only one test bit generator is adequate for both subgroups, where an inverter is added to invert the test bit for M2. Meanwhile, research in [10] proposes the modification in the memory BIST design to fusion three different algorithms (MATS, March X, and March C) in one design. The proposed technique was proven inefficient in improving the fault detection of the memory BIST, as it only allows the system to select one test algorithm to be used (among three options available) when the circuit is operating, by utilizing a multiplexer.…”
Section: Previous Work On Improving the Memory Testing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was achieved by dividing the test operations into two subgroups which are executed in parallel: M1: ⇑(w0); ⇑(r0, w1); ⇑(r1); ⇓(w0); ⇓(r0, w1); ⇓(r1) M2: ⇑(w1); ⇑(r1, w0); ⇑(r0); ⇓(w1); ⇓(r1, w0); ⇓(r0) By observing the proposed algorithm, it can be seen that M2 is exactly the complement of M1, and thus, only one test bit generator is adequate for both subgroups, where an inverter is added to invert the test bit for M2. Meanwhile, research in [10] proposes the modification in the memory BIST design to fusion three different algorithms (MATS, March X, and March C) in one design. The proposed technique was proven inefficient in improving the fault detection of the memory BIST, as it only allows the system to select one test algorithm to be used (among three options available) when the circuit is operating, by utilizing a multiplexer.…”
Section: Previous Work On Improving the Memory Testing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the quality of the memories is the main factor in having a good manufacturing yield [3]- [9]. Testing an embedded memory like a DRAM and SRAM can be very challenging, due to its extreme density [10]. Furthermore, most IC chips are manufactured using very deep submicron (VDSM), more defects are occurring during the chip fabrication process resulting in complex chip testing [9], [11]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a single cell and two cells fault models. For single-cell fault model, it consists of Stuck-At Fault (SAF), Transition Fault (TF), and Data Retention Fault (DRF) [10][11][12].…”
Section: Memory Fault Detection Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various memory test algorithms were introduced to test the memory devices [6,[10][11][12]. The conventional test algorithms are zero-one and checkboard scan tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the characteristics of modern memory of computer systems that meet the requirements of new technological advances, the necessity and importance of testing memory devices have increased sufficiently [1,2]. The main task of memory testing is to detect faulty states described by various models of their failures [3][4][5]. Among the large variety of memory faults, coupling faults, CFs, involve two memory cells, a i and a j .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%