2003
DOI: 10.1110/ps.03219603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic chemical shift markers for loop conformation and substrate and cofactor binding in dihydrofolate reductase complexes

Abstract: Heteronuclear NMR methods have been used to probe the conformation of four complexes of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) in solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the holoenzyme has been crystallized in both closed and occluded states as shown in Figure 1B, recent solution NMR work shows it to be predominantly closed in solution (Osborne et al, 2003). The MTX complex, considered a model for DHFR’s transition state, is also found in the closed conformation (Matthews et al, 1977; Sawaya and Kraut, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the holoenzyme has been crystallized in both closed and occluded states as shown in Figure 1B, recent solution NMR work shows it to be predominantly closed in solution (Osborne et al, 2003). The MTX complex, considered a model for DHFR’s transition state, is also found in the closed conformation (Matthews et al, 1977; Sawaya and Kraut, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMR data provide independent yardsticks, but not necessarily a one-to-one correspondence to molecular flexing. Chemical shift (CS) perturbations reflect changes in the local chemical environment, including, but not limited to conformation change or direct influence of ligand-binding (Osborne et al, 2003; Zuiderweg, 2002). NMR relaxation exchange contributions (R ex ), quantified from relaxation dispersion experiments, reflects dynamic changes in CS occurring on μs-to-ms time scales (Boehr et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution structures of the binary and ternary LcDHFR enzyme complexes are also available (1, 2, 22, 23), though no analysis of shift differences between binary and ternary enzyme complexes has been previously reported. Comparison of the NADPH-bound binary complex (PDB ID 2HQP) and the trimethoprim – NADPH-bound ternary complex (PDB ID 1LUD (1)) shows the greatest structural differences in regions already indicated by the EcDHFR NMR studies (4, 5) and our own BaDHFR NMR studies (Figure S1 in Supporting Information shows a superposition of the binary and ternary LcDHFR structures and notes the structural differences). A superposition of the three structures (BaDHFR, EcDHFR, and LcDHFR) yields a structural alignment (Figure 6) and facilitates the interpretation of residue characteristics at equivalent positions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…For BaDHFR, differences were interpreted from the titration HSQC data shown in Figure 4. For EcDHFR, differences were taken from refs 4 and 5. For LcDHFR, differences were interpreted from comparisons between the reported binary and ternary structures.…”
Section: Figures and Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%