2020
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019003236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic bone marrow biopsy in patients with stage I EMZL treated with radiation therapy: needed or not?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PET/CT for detection of BM disease has recently been evaluated in several studies in both HL and NHL 32–34,46–48 . The 2014 Lugano classification proposes omitting routine BM biopsy in patients with HL based on data from the Danish Lymphoma Registry study 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PET/CT for detection of BM disease has recently been evaluated in several studies in both HL and NHL 32–34,46–48 . The 2014 Lugano classification proposes omitting routine BM biopsy in patients with HL based on data from the Danish Lymphoma Registry study 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,45 PET/CT for detection of BM disease has recently been evaluated in several studies in both HL and NHL. [32][33][34][46][47][48] The 2014 Lugano classification proposes omitting routine BM biopsy in patients with HL based on data from the Danish Lymphoma Registry study. 30 biopsy remains endorsed by European Society for Medical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LDH elevation is uncommon in patients with localized ocular adnexa EMZL in general, and specifically in conjunctival EMZL 19 ; therefore, patients with missing LDH values were grouped with the "low-risk category" in calculation of MALT-IPI score. BM involvement is also uncommon in these patients (<10%) 19 and since we have previously demonstrated that BM examination lacks survival impact in patients with stage I EMZL determined by physical examination/ imaging studies and treated with frontline RT, 22 disease, according to the current Ann Arbor staging classification. 23 All patients were further categorized according to the TNM-AJCC International Union Against Cancer ocular lymphoma staging system.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Staging work-up has been well standardized across lymphoma subtypes; however, it remains ambiguous in MZL. [14][15][16][17][18] Current frontline regimens were derived from phase III clinical trials largely based on FL patients, that frequently included relatively small cohorts of MZL patients spanning all subtypes as a single group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%