2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2005.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of N-Terminal ProBNP in Primary Care Patients With Suspected Heart Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
75
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
75
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…By ROC analysis, BNP showed good diagnostic power to detect HF (area under the curve, 0.94 -0.98), with similar performance described for NTproBNP in 2 previous studies involving primary care patients with dyspnea referred for echocardiography (33,34 ). Furthermore, our data confirm that decisional values should vary also according to the population of patients tested (35 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…By ROC analysis, BNP showed good diagnostic power to detect HF (area under the curve, 0.94 -0.98), with similar performance described for NTproBNP in 2 previous studies involving primary care patients with dyspnea referred for echocardiography (33,34 ). Furthermore, our data confirm that decisional values should vary also according to the population of patients tested (35 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The cut-off values for NT-pro BNP and BNP assigned at the maximal specificity and maximal sensitivity were assessed at values of 367 pg/ml and 172 pg/ml. The assessed cut-off values for NT-pro BNP and BNP do not differ significantly from the cut-off values presented in other studies presenting the cut-off values at the levels of 125-895 pg/ml for NT-proBNP 14,15 and of 32-295 pg/ml for the BNP 15,16 according to the age, gender, assay and diagnosis. The discrepancy in the cut-off values and modest AUC levels and negative predictive values found in our study for both natriuretic peptides are due to the fact, that other cardiac patients with normal ventricular systolic function (LVEF > 60 %) were taken as a control group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In 34 patients (41%), baseline NT-proBNP level was elevated (≥125 pg/mL). 13 Only 1 patient had reduced renal function (glomerular filtration rate, 56 mL/min). The average cESS on echocardiography was 143±35 kdyne/cm 2 .…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NTproBNP level ≥125 pg/mL was considered abnormal. 13 The estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ) was calculated to exclude renal dysfunction as a cause for increased NT-proBNP concentrations.…”
Section: N-terminal Probnpmentioning
confidence: 99%