2018
DOI: 10.1177/1129729818783965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology in Spain: A snapshot of current situation

Abstract: Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology is slowly spreading in Spain. It includes basic techniques to our specialty, allowing nephrologists to be more independent, efficient, and reducing waiting times and costs, overall improving patient care. Nowadays, more nephrologists aim to perform them. Therefore, appropriate training on different techniques should be warranted, implementing an official certification and teaching programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data collected are subjective and vulnerable to recall bias. The survey's small sample size limits generalisability, while it is also subject to selection bias and participation bias by not representing views of those who did not participate 17–19 . Full‐time employment figures may have been distorted by excluding physicians with greater clinical workloads and hence less time to participate in our survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data collected are subjective and vulnerable to recall bias. The survey's small sample size limits generalisability, while it is also subject to selection bias and participation bias by not representing views of those who did not participate 17–19 . Full‐time employment figures may have been distorted by excluding physicians with greater clinical workloads and hence less time to participate in our survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey's small sample size limits generalisability, while it is also subject to selection bias and participation bias by not representing views of those who did not participate. [17][18][19] Full-time employment figures may have been distorted by excluding physicians with greater clinical workloads and hence less time to participate in our survey. The response rate of 32% is commensurate with other studies of this type albeit suboptimal, and although the questionnaire was limited to ANZSN members, 84% of nephrologists and trainees are subscribed members and therefore most are accounted for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work has limitations. Although the response rate is comparable to other unincentivized, non-mandatory HCP surveys, it only accounted for 31% of UK nephrology trainees [ 25 28 ]. We opted for this approach to foster open and honest responses, uninfluenced by external pressures and reassuringly, respondent demographics broadly matched that of the UK nephrology training cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%