2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.05.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Amsel criteria compared standardized method of Gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
4
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were consistent with other studies (Table 5). 6,7 Among all Amsel criteria, PH>4.5 had highest sensitivity (97.50%), and lowest specificity (77.78%), which was similar to various other studies. [8][9][10][11] It can be explained by the fact that measurement of vaginal pH is easily affected by the presence of blood or semen or application of lubricant gel which can increase the vaginal ph.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings were consistent with other studies (Table 5). 6,7 Among all Amsel criteria, PH>4.5 had highest sensitivity (97.50%), and lowest specificity (77.78%), which was similar to various other studies. [8][9][10][11] It can be explained by the fact that measurement of vaginal pH is easily affected by the presence of blood or semen or application of lubricant gel which can increase the vaginal ph.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In present study whiff test had best sensitivity (92.50%) and specificity (90.00%) which was similar to other studies. 7 The combination of PH and whiff test had high sensitivity (90.19%) and specificity (97.78%) so recommended for evaluation of vaginosis similar to previous studies. [13][14]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Landers et al (28) estudiaron una población de 598 mujeres (con una prevalencia de 62 % de VB diagnosticada por coloración de Gram) y encontraron un mayor rendimiento para el diagnóstico clínico de VB, con una sensibilidad de 92 %, una especificidad de 77 % y valor predictivo positivo de 80 %. Moussavi y Behrouzi (29), en una población de 102 pacientes, encontraron que la presencia de flujo vaginal presenta una sensibilidad de 63 % y una especificidad de 80 % para el diagnóstico de VB, siendo la especificidad mayor a la encontrada en el presente estudio. La prueba de aminas o de whiff, como único criterio diagnóstico, tuvo una una sensibilidad del 99,3 % y una especificidad del 99,8 % en el presente estudio.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En un estudio de Thulkar et al (30), en un grupo de mujeres con flujo vaginal anormal, y con una prevalencia de VB de 39 %, la prueba de aminas tuvo una sensibilidad de 94,0 %, similar a la de este estudio, pero con una menor especificidad, de 67,7 %. Para la prueba de aminas, otras investigaciones, como la de Moussavi y Behrouzi (29), encontraron características operativas inferiores a la de nuestro estudio (sensibilidad de 75 %, especificidad de 73 %).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The three dominant bacteria were stained according to the Gram procedure (Moussavi and Behrouzi 2004). The results showed that the bacterium of Colony 1 was rod-shaped with uniform red color observed by the microscope, indicating it was gram negative bacterium.…”
Section: Identification Of Dominant Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%