2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03449-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) for the detection of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 To minimise false-negatives, a VI-RADS score of ≥3 is considered indicative of MIBC, with recent meta-analyses reporting high sensitivity (0.83-0.92), specificity (0.82-0.90), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.93-0.94) ranges. [21][22][23][24][25] mpMRI preceding TURBT could potentially lead to earlier MIBC recognition and treatment initiation. 26 VI-RADS may also serve as a non-invasive post-treatment monitoring and follow-up alternative to cystoscopy for BCa.…”
Section: Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mpmri)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 To minimise false-negatives, a VI-RADS score of ≥3 is considered indicative of MIBC, with recent meta-analyses reporting high sensitivity (0.83-0.92), specificity (0.82-0.90), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.93-0.94) ranges. [21][22][23][24][25] mpMRI preceding TURBT could potentially lead to earlier MIBC recognition and treatment initiation. 26 VI-RADS may also serve as a non-invasive post-treatment monitoring and follow-up alternative to cystoscopy for BCa.…”
Section: Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mpmri)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the vast majority of published studies are single-institution and retrospective in nature, consistent data has recently been gained from prospective multicentre studies and systematic reviews. Five different meta-analyses on VI-RADS unanimously reported high sensitivity and specificity for predicting muscle invasion as well as a high diagnostic accuracy [13][14][15][16][17]. As summarised in Table 5, sensitivity, specificity and AUC ranged between 0.83-0.92, 0.82-0.90 and 0.93-0.94, respectively, when a cut-off score of VI-RADS ≥ 3 was used, and 0.77-0.78, 0.94-0.97 and 0.91-0.94, respectively, when a cut-off score of VI-RADS ≥ 4 was used.…”
Section: Diagnostic Performance Of Vi-radsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T he rapid increase of numerous standardized imaging reporting and data systems such as liver, prostate, and vesicle imaging reporting and data systems (LI-RADS, PI-RADS, and VI-RADS, respectively) has further elucidated the limitations of subjective human interpretation in terms of reproducibility and accuracy. [1][2][3][4] In an effort to improve upon these inherent limitations there has been ongoing research in the field of quantitative imaging biomarkers. These biomarkers, derived from the image data itself have shown great potential in answering numerous clinical questions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a meta-analysis of 19 studies a VI-RADS score of 4 was shown to predict muscle invasion with 78% sensitivity and 96% specificity. 3 A meta-analysis exploring VI-RADS inter-reader agreement in VI-RADS showed Kappa varying from 0.45 to 0.96 and averaging 0.76 in 19 studies. 4 In spite of the relatively high accuracy and inter-reader agreement as compared to the more traditional, invasive approach of TURBT, there remains plenty of room for improvement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation