“…According to the review by Lewis et al and several subsequently published papers, there are in total 14 studies that have assessed the accuracy of ATI in the quantification of HS compared with the reference methods, as well as their determined cut-offs and AUROC values, which are presented in Table 4 [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ]. Several authors have compared ATI with the CAP, but due to its suboptimal performance in quantifying the liver fat content, the latest WFUMB guidelines recommend against using the CAP as the reference standard [ 3 ].…”