2013
DOI: 10.1111/echo.12462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of Transesophageal Echocardiogram for the Detection of Patent Foramen Ovale: A Meta‐Analysis

Abstract: While TEE bubble study is considered to be the gold standard modality for diagnosing PFO, some PFOs may still be missed or misdiagnosed. It is important to understand the limitations of TEE and perhaps use other highly sensitive screening tests, such as transcranial doppler (TCD), in conjunction with TEE before scheduling a patient for transcatheter PFO closure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
60
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, transesophageal echocardiography is required for the diagnosis [4,5]. It is well known that patent foramen ovale is a risk factor for cerebral infarction; the resulting conditions are referred to as cryptogenic strokes or strokes of unclear origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, transesophageal echocardiography is required for the diagnosis [4,5]. It is well known that patent foramen ovale is a risk factor for cerebral infarction; the resulting conditions are referred to as cryptogenic strokes or strokes of unclear origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TEE bubble study is currently considered as the gold standard for PFO investigation, false-negative results or misdiagnosed RLS may occur. 55,56 Moreover, it is technically challenging to perform adequate Valsalva maneuver during TEE investigation. 55,56 TCD is a more sensitive (sensitivity: 95%-98%) method for the diagnosis of RLS compared with TEE (sensitivity: 80%-100%) 57-59 but does not provide any information about other potential cardiac and aortic embolic sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCD has been demonstrated to have high sensitivity and specificity for detection of rightto-left shunting when compared to contrast transesophageal echocardiography and is superior to transthoracic echocardiography. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with agitated saline has decreased sensitivity of detecting an intracardiac shunt in OSA patients with elevated BMI and large body habitus secondary to limited acoustic windows. 13,21 Using passage of a guide wire across the atrial septum during cardiac catheterization with intracardiac echocardiography guidance as the standard for diagnosing a PFO, TCD has a 98% sensitivity for making the diagnosis of PFO.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20] Compared with heart catheterization for PFO detection, TCD is more sensitive than TEE since there is a 10% false negative rate with TEE because patients cannot perform a Valsalva maneuver with a TEE probe down their esophagus. 20,[22][23][24] The patients in our study with OSA and PFO did not undergo PFO closure, which would be needed to evaluate a cause and effect relationship.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%