2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of the Abbott ID NOW SARS-CoV-2 rapid test for the triage of acute medical admissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results present a potential blood-based diagnostic for severe infections with SARS-CoV-2. Considering the diversity of reactions that patients have to the virus, incorporating these biomarkers as additional data points to assess patient risk of severe disease could be pivotal in augmenting the clinical decision making processes [107] , [108] , [109] . This is especially relevant when resources may be limited and priority must be given to those with severe infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results present a potential blood-based diagnostic for severe infections with SARS-CoV-2. Considering the diversity of reactions that patients have to the virus, incorporating these biomarkers as additional data points to assess patient risk of severe disease could be pivotal in augmenting the clinical decision making processes [107] , [108] , [109] . This is especially relevant when resources may be limited and priority must be given to those with severe infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results present a potential predictor for the severity levels of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Considering the diversity of reactions that patients have to the virus, incorporating these biomarkers as additional data points to assess patient risk of severe disease could be pivotal in augmenting both personal and public health decision making processes [64][65][66]. This is especially relevant when resources may be limited and priority must be given to those with the greatest risk of severe infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… In asymptomatic patients ≥12 years old without risk factors for severe COVID-19, we suggest the use of laboratory-based NAAT versus rapid antigen testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Weak against Low [ 11 , 20 , 49 , 54 , 55 , 65 , 70 , 71 , 77 , 83 , 89 , 94 , 22 , 111 , 113 , 121 , 128 , 130 , 137 , [143] , [144] , [145] , [146] , 24 , [147] , [148] , [149] , 158 , [160] , [161] , [162] , [163] , [164] , [165] , 28 , [166] , [167] , [168] , [169] , [170] , [171] , [172] , [173] , [174] , [175] , 34 , 176 , 40 , 43 , 44 , 46 ] 3 In asymptomatic people of any age with any risk factor(s) for severe COVID-19 (including age <3 or ≥65 years) should rapid antigen tests be used, as compared to laboratory-based ...…”
Section: Questions Addressed By the Guideline Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“… In asymptomatic people, we suggest the use of laboratory-based NAAT in nasopharyngeal samples versus rapid antigen testing in nasopharyngeal samples for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Weak against Low [ 11 , 18 , 38 , 43 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 50 , [54] , [55] , [56] , 20 , 57 , 65 , 67 , 68 , 70 , 71 , 77 , 81 , 83 , 86 , 22 , 87 , 90 , 92 , 94 , 99 , 102 , 113 , 155 , 158 , 160 , 24 , [161] , [162] , [163] , 165 , 168 , 170 , [172] , [173] , [174] , [175] , 28 , [176] , [177] , [178] , [179] , [180] , [181] , [182] , [183] , [29] , [30] ...…”
Section: Questions Addressed By the Guideline Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation