2017
DOI: 10.1177/1753193417695180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of single-compartment magnetic resonance arthrography in detecting common causes of chronic wrist pain

Abstract: III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are comparable to the previously reported studies comparing MRI/MRA and arthroscopy in the literature 101112131415161718…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results are comparable to the previously reported studies comparing MRI/MRA and arthroscopy in the literature 101112131415161718…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results of MRA using direct intra-articular contrast injection for central TFCC lesions (showed sensitivity and specificity 100% & 100% respectively) are higher than the indirect (intravenous) wrist MRA results of Haims et al [22] who used 1.5 T scanner and reported sensitivity and specificity in assessment of the central disk of TFCC (83% & 91% respectively). Recently, Asaad et al [15] who used also single radiocarpal injection and a 1.5 T scanner revealed sensitivity and specificity (89% & 91% respectively) for central TFCC lesions being lower when compared to our results which can be attributed to their detection of Full thickness TFCC tears only.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Our results of MRA for peripheral ulnar TFCC lesions revealed sensitivity and specificity being 100% & 90.9% respectively are superior to those detected by Asaad et al [15] who used single radiocarpal injection and a 1.5 T scanner revealed lower sensitivity and specificity for peripheral ulnar TFCC lesions (83% & 80% respectively). He attributed his lower sensitivity of MRA for peripheral ulnar TFCC tears than central to the more complex anatomy of the peripheral region of the TFCC, and the possibility that associated focal synovitis at the injured ulnar TFCC attachment might impede the passage of contrast [15].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While static SL instability has been a subject of a great attention with diagnosis and treatment options proposed (Asaad et al., 2017; Elgammal and Lukas, 2016; Koehler et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Lindau, 2016; Mathoulin, 2017), dynamic instability of the radial side of the carpus is an area of sparse investigations. No well-agreed treatment plan is established for dynamic instability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%