2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Enhanced versus Variable Corneal Compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
62
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
62
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We have recently demonstrated how a control cohort with no suspicious findings of glaucoma can affect the diagnostic ability of SDOCT parameters in glaucoma compared with a control cohort which is likely to be misinterpreted as glaucoma. 16 Due to the same reason, AUCs of RNFL parameters reported in our study are also lower compared with the studies that have reported the same with SDOCT 7,10,29 and GDx ECC 5,12,13,30 separately.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have recently demonstrated how a control cohort with no suspicious findings of glaucoma can affect the diagnostic ability of SDOCT parameters in glaucoma compared with a control cohort which is likely to be misinterpreted as glaucoma. 16 Due to the same reason, AUCs of RNFL parameters reported in our study are also lower compared with the studies that have reported the same with SDOCT 7,10,29 and GDx ECC 5,12,13,30 separately.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The amount of birefringence bias is then mathematically removed point by point from the total 1 VST Glaucoma Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India 2 Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India birefringence pattern of the image to improve the signal and obtain a retardation pattern of the RNFL with the least noise. [4][5][6] Though numerous studies have reported good diagnostic ability of both SDOCT [7][8][9][10][11] and GDx ECC 12,13 in glaucoma, there is limited literature on the head-to-head comparison of these imaging techniques in the same population. 14,15 Also, most of these studies have employed a case-control design including glaucoma patients (cases), defined based on the presence of repeatable characteristic glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects; and normal subjects (controls), usually recruited from the general population and having normal intraocular pressures (IOPs), healthy appearance of the optic nerve and normal VFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14]16 ARP is a pattern of retardation, which do not match the histological distribution of RNFL thickness with thicker RNFL in the superior and inferior regions compared with the temporal and nasal regions. Recently, some clinical aspects of ARP have been reported, including the prevalence of ARP in normal and glaucomatous eyes 9,13,16 and the impact of ARP on the performance of glaucoma diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[11][12][13][14]16 ARP is a pattern of retardation, which do not match the histological distribution of RNFL thickness with thicker RNFL in the superior and inferior regions compared with the temporal and nasal regions. Recently, some clinical aspects of ARP have been reported, including the prevalence of ARP in normal and glaucomatous eyes 9,13,16 and the impact of ARP on the performance of glaucoma diagnosis. [11][12][13][14] The enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) has been developed as an alternative algorithm to the variable corneal compensation (VCC) method to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and eliminate artefacts associated with ARP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation