2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35288-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland ultrasonography with different scoring systems in Sjögren’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Noninvasive objective salivary gland ultrasonography (SGU) had been widely used to evaluate major salivary gland involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) and treatment responses. However, the evaluation score, diagnostic sensitivity, and diagnostic specificity significantly varied among clinical studies. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of different SGU scoring systems using the American-European Consensus Group criteria. Of the 1301 articles retrieved from six databases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al realised a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SGUS and observed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93% for the diagnosis of SS. 14 Nevertheless, they pulled studies with different scoring systems. Recently, Mossel et al have shown that a combination of parotid and submandibular gland US grading and a serological test for anti-SS antibodies can effectively predict the AECG, ACR or ACR/EULAR classification results of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al realised a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SGUS and observed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93% for the diagnosis of SS. 14 Nevertheless, they pulled studies with different scoring systems. Recently, Mossel et al have shown that a combination of parotid and submandibular gland US grading and a serological test for anti-SS antibodies can effectively predict the AECG, ACR or ACR/EULAR classification results of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mode-B ultrasound using a high frequency linear probe allows characterization of size, homogeneity, presence of hypo-/anechoic areas, hyperechoic bands and clearness of SG borders. These different items were included in several diagnostic scores [ 257 ]. The OMERACT group, in an attempt to standardize, developed in 2019 a semi-quantitative scoring (0–3) based on the presence of hypoechoic/anechoic zones within the parenchyma of the parotid and submandibular glands [ 258 ].…”
Section: Diagnosis Workupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple, semi-quantitative 0-3 SGUS scoring system was recently selected by a systematic review and meta-analysis as more appropriate for diagnostic purposes in terms of specificity and heterogeneity in pSS, with respect to the other scoring systems available (e.g., 0-16 and 0-48) (19). One of the aims of the work-package 7 (WP7) of the HarmonicSS project is to develop and improve the role of SGUS for pSS management.…”
Section: Salivary Gland Ultrasound Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%