2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple system atrophy: The impact of echo time and the potential of histogram analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably due to the TE and magnetic field strength dependence described in the literature. 37,38 TEs in our study at 7T compared with 3T are slightly shorter than the factor 2.6, which is recommended by Lancione et al to maximize reproducibility. Also, to increase the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at 3T, more TEs were acquired at 3T than at 7T due to the longer TR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is probably due to the TE and magnetic field strength dependence described in the literature. 37,38 TEs in our study at 7T compared with 3T are slightly shorter than the factor 2.6, which is recommended by Lancione et al to maximize reproducibility. Also, to increase the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at 3T, more TEs were acquired at 3T than at 7T due to the longer TR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This is probably due to the TE and magnetic field strength dependence described in the literature. 37,38 Using the data derived from this study, an a priori power analysis (using G*Power) 40 suggest an n of 22 per group to be sufficient to detect differences in the SN with a power of 0.9, while for the Pu and the GP, an n of 15 and 12, respectively, would allow to detect differences with a power of 0.9. Thus, the sample size in this study is large enough to deliver robust results for the Pu and the GP at 3T, whereas the results presented for the 7T cohort and the possible MSA subgroup need to be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Why Does 7t Mri Yield Increased Diagnostic Accuracy?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When only the positive QSM values in M1 were considered, all distribution indices (mean value, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis) exhibited statistically significant differences between the two groups. This observation suggests that a good strategy to highlight differences between ALS patients and controls might be to direct the analysis to positive-only QSM values (as it was carried out also by Schweitzer and colleagues [ 8 ]) and to distribution indices that carry information regarding the distribution tails, such as the standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis, whose highly informative roles have been demonstrated also in recent QSM studies on Parkinson’s disease [ 26 ] and Multiple System Atrophy [ 27 ]. Another important result of this study is the demonstration that improved classification of ALS patients and controls can be achieved by leveraging on the joint use of the distribution indices of QSM values in M1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, such characteristic has been shown to be more distinct in the Parkinsonian subtype of MSA compared to MSA-C. Disease-subtype-specific examination of iron dysregulation reveals distinct patterns of iron deposition in pathology-related anatomical systems (Figure 2). In MSA-P, iron accumulation is consistently most extenuated in the putamen as a disease-distinguishing pathological hallmark [168][169][170]. Moreover, subcortical regions, including the GP and the SN, are affected by greater deposition of iron compared to MSA-C brains [168,170].…”
Section: Iron Dysregulation In Msamentioning
confidence: 98%