2015
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a systematic review noted that POS can identify 5 out of 6 babies with CCHD. Furthermore, the false positive rate is 0.06% and 0.42%, when POS is done after 24 hours of age and before 2 hours of age, respectively 10 . Therefore, POS has gained popularity across the world for detection of CCHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a systematic review noted that POS can identify 5 out of 6 babies with CCHD. Furthermore, the false positive rate is 0.06% and 0.42%, when POS is done after 24 hours of age and before 2 hours of age, respectively 10 . Therefore, POS has gained popularity across the world for detection of CCHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of our study was the high false positive rate of 0.7%, compared to the rate of 0.14% in previous studies [4]. This is likely explained by the fact that our screening programme involves performing pulse oximetry screening between 4-12 hours after birth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Globally, many research studies have been performed on pulse oximetry screening for detection of critical CHDs [4], [12]- [14], [18], [19], [22]. Most have focused on the detection of CCHDs and non-cardiac conditions by POS: there remains a paucity of data on missed cases of CCHD and major CHDs not detected by pulse oximetry screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations