2022
DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen below 4 ng/mL as a cutoff for diagnosing prostate cancer in a hospital setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Purpose A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cutoff of 4 ng/mL has been widely used for prostate cancer screening in population-based settings. However, the accuracy of PSA below 4 ng/mL as a cutoff for diagnosing prostate cancer in a hospital setting is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of PSA below 4 ng/mL cutoff in a hospital setting. Materials and Methods We systematically reviewed the literature by searching major databases until March 2020, and a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interesting study from Korean group Jin et al [ 6 ], recently demonstrated PSA with a cut-off value <3 ng/mL is relatively more sensitive and specific than PSA ≥3 ng/mL and did not show any significant differences neither sensitivity nor specificity during the diagnosis of PCa. Due to this reason, Jin et al [ 6 ], offers clinicians may select the appropriate PSA cut-off value based on clinical episode regarding patients’ attribution related to the risk of PCa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting study from Korean group Jin et al [ 6 ], recently demonstrated PSA with a cut-off value <3 ng/mL is relatively more sensitive and specific than PSA ≥3 ng/mL and did not show any significant differences neither sensitivity nor specificity during the diagnosis of PCa. Due to this reason, Jin et al [ 6 ], offers clinicians may select the appropriate PSA cut-off value based on clinical episode regarding patients’ attribution related to the risk of PCa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%